- Follow AUTO DEALER + COVERAGE BUZZ on WordPress.com
-
-
Recent Posts
- MINNESOTA NO-FAULT ACT: WHEN IS AN INJURED CLAIMANT “OCCUPYING” A VEHICLE – “IN,” “ON,” “ENTERING INTO” AND “ALIGHTING FROM”
- MN AUTO COVERAGE: NON-EXISTENT POLICY EXCLUSIONS, CONFORMITY CLAUSES & THE NO-FAULT ACT
- Minnesota No-Fault Coverage: “Stacking” the Weekly Rate-of-Pay-Limit
- G Johnson Law: Neutral Insurance Coverage Evaluations
- Minnesota Auto Coverage: Supreme Court holds that Non-Licensed Insurers Must Pay Minnesota Benefits Too
Disclaimer
This blog is for informational purposes only. This may be considered attorney advertising in some states. The opinions on this blog do not reflect those of the author’s law firm or the author’s past and present clients. By reading it, no attorney-client relationship is formed. The law is constantly changing and is different in each jurisdiction. If you want legal advice, please consult an attorney. The opinions expressed here belong only to the individual contributor(s). Gregory J. Johnson © All rights reserved 2015.Top Posts & Pages
- Protecting the Dealership's "Front-End" and "Back-End": What Does that Mean?
- Loss of Use: Is the At-Fault Driver's Insurer Required to Provide a "Comparable" Rental Vehicle?
- Auto Dealer-Arranged Financing: When must TIL Disclosures be Provided?
- The Liability Insurer’s “Hidden” Duty to Defend-- the Obligation to Pay for its Insured’s Affirmative Claims.
- MN AUTO COVERAGE: NON-EXISTENT POLICY EXCLUSIONS, CONFORMITY CLAUSES & THE NO-FAULT ACT
Archives
- October 2017 (1)
- September 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (2)
- December 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (4)
- February 2016 (5)
- January 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (2)
- November 2015 (1)
- October 2015 (2)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (2)
- March 2015 (5)
- January 2015 (1)
- November 2014 (5)
- October 2014 (3)
- September 2014 (11)
- August 2014 (9)
- November 2010 (6)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (5)
- August 2010 (7)
- July 2010 (2)
- June 2010 (8)
Auto Dealer Monthly- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Auto Rental News
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Insurance Journal
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Follow on Facebook
Tag Archives: Insured Contract
(Part VI) Minnesota CGL: Getting a Handle on Large Construction Defect Claims
This post is a continuation of the series “Minnesota CGL: Getting a Handle on Large Construction Defect Claims.” This post (Part VI) is the first of several posts which address additional insured (AI) coverage for a general contractor under the … Continue reading
(Part IV): Minnesota CGL: Getting a Handle on Large Construction Defect Claims
This post (Part IV) is a continuation of my multiple part series “Minnesota CGL: Getting a Handle on Large Construction Defect Claims.” (You may want to read the prior posts in this series to catch up). This post addresses the specific requirements … Continue reading
(Part III) Minnesota CGL: Getting a Handle on Large Construction Defect Claims
This post is a continuation of the series “Minnesota CGL: Getting a Handle on Large Construction Defect Claims.” This post (Part III) addresses the “strict construction” test used to interpret indemnification agreements. Part IV will address the specific requirements of “insured … Continue reading
(Part II) Minnesota CGL: Getting a Handle on Large Construction Defect Claims
This post is a continuation of the series “Minnesota CGL: Getting a Handle on Large Construction Defect Claims.” This post, as well as the next three, will focus on the subcontractor’s liability to a general contractor pursuant to an indemnity … Continue reading
Posted in CGL, Coverage
Tagged Additional Insured Coverage, Allocation, CGL Coverage, Commercial Liability Coverage, Construction Defect, Contractual Risk Transfer, Gregory J. Johnson, Holmes v. Watson Forsberg, Indemnity Clauses, Insurance Law, Insured Contract, Strict Construction, Wooddale
Leave a comment
AUTO DEALER + COVERAGE BUZZ 