- Follow AUTO DEALER + COVERAGE BUZZ on WordPress.com
-
-
Recent Posts
- MINNESOTA NO-FAULT ACT: WHEN IS AN INJURED CLAIMANT “OCCUPYING” A VEHICLE – “IN,” “ON,” “ENTERING INTO” AND “ALIGHTING FROM”
- MN AUTO COVERAGE: NON-EXISTENT POLICY EXCLUSIONS, CONFORMITY CLAUSES & THE NO-FAULT ACT
- Minnesota No-Fault Coverage: “Stacking” the Weekly Rate-of-Pay-Limit
- G Johnson Law: Neutral Insurance Coverage Evaluations
- Minnesota Auto Coverage: Supreme Court holds that Non-Licensed Insurers Must Pay Minnesota Benefits Too
Disclaimer
This blog is for informational purposes only. This may be considered attorney advertising in some states. The opinions on this blog do not reflect those of the author’s law firm or the author’s past and present clients. By reading it, no attorney-client relationship is formed. The law is constantly changing and is different in each jurisdiction. If you want legal advice, please consult an attorney. The opinions expressed here belong only to the individual contributor(s). Gregory J. Johnson © All rights reserved 2015.Top Posts & Pages
- Protecting the Dealership's "Front-End" and "Back-End": What Does that Mean?
- Loss of Use: Is the At-Fault Driver's Insurer Required to Provide a "Comparable" Rental Vehicle?
- Dealership Arranged Financing: The Indirect Auto Lending Process
- MINNESOTA NO-FAULT ACT: WHEN IS AN INJURED CLAIMANT “OCCUPYING” A VEHICLE – “IN,” “ON,” “ENTERING INTO” AND “ALIGHTING FROM”
- Minnesota Adopts "Equitable Contribution" to Apportion Defense Fees
- The Graves Amendment: Is an Auto Dealer Vicariously Liable for a Customer’s Negligent Operation of a Loaner Vehicle?
- Guest Contributor Jim Radogna: F&I Fact vs. Fiction
Archives
- October 2017 (1)
- September 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (2)
- December 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (4)
- February 2016 (5)
- January 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (2)
- November 2015 (1)
- October 2015 (2)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (2)
- March 2015 (5)
- January 2015 (1)
- November 2014 (5)
- October 2014 (3)
- September 2014 (11)
- August 2014 (9)
- November 2010 (6)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (5)
- August 2010 (7)
- July 2010 (2)
- June 2010 (8)
Auto Dealer Monthly- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Auto Rental News
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Insurance Journal
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Follow on Facebook
Monthly Archives: June 2010
Negotiated Medical Payments are Collateral Sources says Minnesota Supreme Court
In Swanson v. Brewster, Ct. File AO8-8O6, a decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court released on June 29, 2010, the court held that negotiated-discount amounts—amounts a plaintiff is billed by a medical provider but does not pay because the plaintiff’s … Continue reading
Posted in BAP, CGL, Coverage
Tagged CGL Coverage, Commercial Liability Coverage, Gregory J. Johnson, Insurance Law
Leave a comment
Lost Policies: Burdens of Proof
What happens when you cannot find an old liability insurance policy? Here’s a few ground rules. It is well established that the burden of demonstrating liability coverage rests upon the insured. See, e.g., Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co., … Continue reading
Posted in BAP, CGL, Coverage
Tagged CGL Coverage, Commercial Liability Coverage, Gregory J. Johnson, Insurance Law, Lost Policies
Leave a comment
Pro-Rata Time on the Risk: An Insured’s Contribution Obligation
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Cas. Co., 722 N.W.2d 283 (Minn. 2006) is the leading construction defect case in Minnesota. The case involved several insurers (I represented West Bend) and over eighty separate water intrusion claims. In that case, the court recognized, … Continue reading
Can a Self-Insured Retention (“SIR”) Constitute “Insurance”?
Can a self-insured retention (“SIR”) or large deductible under one policy constitute “insurance” within the meaning of another insurer’s “other insurance” clause? This situation typically arises in cases where the mutual insured (1) is a named insured under a liability … Continue reading
Can a Claims Adjuster’s Conduct/Statements Bar an Insured’s Affirmative Defenses?
Can an insured be estopped to assert a statute of limitations defense based on the conduct or statements of a liability insurance claims adjuster? Possibly. It has been held that a liability insurer can act as the insured’s agent when adjusting claims arising … Continue reading
Posted in ADCF Policy, CGL, Coverage
Tagged CGL Coverage, Commercial Liability Coverage, Construction Defect, Insurance Law
Leave a comment
Minnesota Contractual Risk Transfer Materials (1/2009)
A contract is an agreement in which each party promises to do something for the other party. Usually, one party agrees to provide goods or services while the other party agrees to pay for those goods or services. Unfortunately, during … Continue reading
No CGL Coverage Where General Contractor Leaves in the Middle of Project
In Builders Mutual v. R Design, 2010 WL 2079741 (D.S.C.), a federal district court in South Carolina found no coverage exists under a CGL policy, despite “resulting damage,” when the general contractor performed faulty work and left in the middle of the … Continue reading
