- Follow AUTO DEALER + COVERAGE BUZZ on WordPress.com
-
-
Recent Posts
- MINNESOTA NO-FAULT ACT: WHEN IS AN INJURED CLAIMANT “OCCUPYING” A VEHICLE – “IN,” “ON,” “ENTERING INTO” AND “ALIGHTING FROM”
- MN AUTO COVERAGE: NON-EXISTENT POLICY EXCLUSIONS, CONFORMITY CLAUSES & THE NO-FAULT ACT
- Minnesota No-Fault Coverage: “Stacking” the Weekly Rate-of-Pay-Limit
- G Johnson Law: Neutral Insurance Coverage Evaluations
- Minnesota Auto Coverage: Supreme Court holds that Non-Licensed Insurers Must Pay Minnesota Benefits Too
Disclaimer
This blog is for informational purposes only. This may be considered attorney advertising in some states. The opinions on this blog do not reflect those of the author’s law firm or the author’s past and present clients. By reading it, no attorney-client relationship is formed. The law is constantly changing and is different in each jurisdiction. If you want legal advice, please consult an attorney. The opinions expressed here belong only to the individual contributor(s). Gregory J. Johnson © All rights reserved 2015.Top Posts & Pages
- Loss of Use: Is the At-Fault Driver's Insurer Required to Provide a "Comparable" Rental Vehicle?
- Minnesota First-Party Coverages: Recovering Consequential Damages in Addition to the Policy Benefits when the Insurer Declines or Unreasonably Delays Payment.
- CGL Coverage: Latent Defects and Continuous, Progressive or Recurring Damages (Allocation of Liability)
- Dealership Arranged Leases: Is the Lessor Liable for the Lessee’s Negligent Operation of the Vehicle?
- Leasing, Rentals and Vicarious Liability: An Overview of the Graves Amendment
- Protecting the Dealership's "Front-End" and "Back-End": What Does that Mean?
- MN AUTO COVERAGE: NON-EXISTENT POLICY EXCLUSIONS, CONFORMITY CLAUSES & THE NO-FAULT ACT
- The Graves Amendment: Is an Auto Dealer Vicariously Liable for a Customer’s Negligent Operation of a Loaner Vehicle?
- Rental Car Coverage: Diminution in Value, Loss of Use & Loss Damage Waiver (LDW) -- the Basics
- The Liability Insurer’s “Hidden” Duty to Defend-- the Obligation to Pay for its Insured’s Affirmative Claims.
Archives
- October 2017 (1)
- September 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (2)
- December 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (4)
- February 2016 (5)
- January 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (2)
- November 2015 (1)
- October 2015 (2)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (2)
- March 2015 (5)
- January 2015 (1)
- November 2014 (5)
- October 2014 (3)
- September 2014 (11)
- August 2014 (9)
- November 2010 (6)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (5)
- August 2010 (7)
- July 2010 (2)
- June 2010 (8)
Auto Dealer Monthly- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Auto Rental News
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Insurance Journal
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Follow on Facebook
-
-
- Auto Dealer Monthly
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Auto Rental News
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Insurance Journal
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
AUTO DEALER + COVERAGE BUZZ 
Pingback: Howard on Missing The “Buss”: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Refuses … | Minnesota